Twenty seven percent of the US construction market is comprised of building schools. Although, us older folks may have fond memories of that great new school smell (paint, chlorine etc), hopefully the new generation of lucky kids growing up green, probably won't. Building a school that meets LEED standards costs 2 percent (or $3 per square foot) more upfront. While the initial expense of greening a school can be a detractor, the long term upside might change some minds.
Green schools use up to 30 percent less energy, 30 to 50 percent less water, and reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 40 percent compared to traditionally built schools. But beyond the obvious environmental benefits, health benefits and learning boosts might help educators get more Eco-saavy. Here are a few stats to chew on:
- In a 2005 survey of executives that planned and built green K-12 schools, 71 percent said that students performed better and 72 percent said that there was less absenteeism compared to other schools.
- A report put out in October 2006 by the American Federation of Teachers and the US Green Building Council noted that Washington state saw absenteeism decrease by 15 percent in its first green school.
- In a 1999 study, Hershong Mahone Group, a building-efficiency consulting company, evaluated 2,000 classrooms in Oakland, CA, Seattle, WA, and Fort Collins, CO. They found that students with the most daylight progressed 20 percent faster in math, and 26 percent faster in reading than students in classrooms with poor lighting.